KiCad 9 DRC & ERC rules
KiCad copper_sliver DRC: what it means and how to fix it
Understand KiCad 9's copper_sliver DRC rule, its MakeIRL S2 gate class, why it fires, and how to fix and verify it. Includes a practical KiCad repair workflow.
Practical PCB integration · KiCad 9 · Manufacturing gate
What KiCad's copper_sliver rule means
drc:copper_sliver is a real KiCad 9 rule identifier from the PCB Design Rules Checker. A filled zone or copper geometry creates a very narrow wedge or isolated-looking sliver below KiCad's configured minimum. The identifier is the stable part to use in reports, automation, and severity policy; the human-readable violation sentence can vary with the affected items and KiCad version.
Thin slivers may etch unpredictably, detach, or create acid traps, but severity depends on geometry and fab process.
Start from the marker’s exact items and coordinates. Cross-probe them in PCB Editor → Inspect → Design Rules Checker, then inspect the surrounding net, footprint, symbol, rule scope, hierarchy, or layer state. Do not begin by changing the global rule or adding an exclusion: that can hide the symptom while leaving the wrong connectivity, fabrication geometry, library data, or schematic intent in place.
| KiCad rule ID | copper_sliver |
|---|---|
| Source | DRC |
| Meaning | copper sliver |
| MakeIRL class | S2 |
| Explicitly recognized | yes |
| Primary editor | PCB Editor → Inspect → Design Rules Checker |
Why MakeIRL classifies it as S2
The gate surfaces copper slivers as S2 manufacturing review rather than a confirmed open or short.
MakeIRL does not trust the severity label saved in a customer’s .kicad_pro. KiCad can be configured to ignore a rule entirely, so the gate authors a server-owned KiCad 9 reporting policy that forces the real catalog to be emitted and then applies its own rule-ID taxonomy. A project exclusion is recorded as evidence but never lowers the classification. Unknown identifiers also remain visible as S2 rather than disappearing or becoming an unjustified blocker.
S1 is reserved for evidence that a board is actually broken or assembly identity is impossible. S2 means a human engineering decision is required and can be acknowledged; it includes fab margins, many schematic conventions, parity drift, and rules whose intent depends on the product. S3 is advisory library, drafting, text, or silkscreen hygiene. This distinction explains why KiCad’s own “error” or “warning” word is evidence, not the release verdict.
How to fix copper_sliver in KiCad 9
- 01
Refill zones, simplify nearby outlines, increase zone clearance/minimum thickness, move tracks/pads, or remove the unnecessary island that forms the sliver.
- 02
Open PCB Editor → Inspect → Design Rules Checker, select the marker, and cross-probe every reported item before changing a rule or adding an exclusion. Fix the design or library source so the correction survives the next schematic/PCB update.
- 03
Refill all zones and re-run DRC; inspect the Gerber at the exact coordinate because a stale zone fill can preserve an already-fixed sliver.
If the marker came from a library defect, repair the controlled symbol or footprint first and update the schematic/board copy deliberately. If it came from a net class or custom rule, confirm the electrical, timing, safety, or fabrication requirement before changing the number. A narrow, documented rule is safer than weakening the global project to make one marker disappear. For parity findings, compare the exact MPN, symbol pin numbers, footprint pads, BOM, and placement output before accepting either side as authoritative.
Verify the correction before release
Refill all zones and re-run DRC; inspect the Gerber at the exact coordinate because a stale zone fill can preserve an already-fixed sliver.
Save the corrected source files, refill zones when the board contains pours, and rerun the appropriate checker from a clean state. For PCB changes, inspect Gerber, drill, solder-mask, paste, outline, and placement outputs—not only the interactive canvas. For schematic changes, regenerate the netlist/BOM and run Update PCB from Schematic so stale board state cannot survive. Cross-probe the original coordinates and confirm the intended circuit or manufacturing constraint, not merely a zero marker count.
Finally, keep the original finding, the design change, and any remaining engineering acknowledgment in the release record. That gives reviewers a traceable reason why copper_sliver is resolved, accepted as a deliberate S2 decision, or retained as an S3 advisory. Silencing the rule in project settings is never the fix because it changes reporting, not the board.
Check the design before fabrication
Run the release gate and review copper_sliver with the rest of the KiCad evidence.
Check a KiCad project→